|
by Jim Buchta of Star Tribune
Published July 21, /2001
|
Irrational exuberance?
Experts say that the real estate market is not in the midst
of a bubble that's about to burst and that prices are
justified. But steadily falling mortgage interest rates and
strong job growth have helped drive home prices to their highest
level ever.

|
Years of heady home-appreciation rates have some in the Twin
Cities and elsewhere wondering whether housing prices have risen
to unsustainable levels.
After Jeanine Steffens and her husband
lost money on a stock a few years ago, they changed their investment
strategy.
Since then, the Maple Grove couple have put most of their money
into real estate, including a house and a lake cabin that they recently
sold for double what they paid in 1996.
``Real estate is the only thing we've had that doesn't go anywhere''
but up, Steffens said. ``We look at each other and say we're glad
we're not involved in [stocks] anymore.''
For many investors whose stock portfolios have been ravaged, the
strong gains in their home values have been a welcome counterbalance.
But some observers are questioning whether whole sections of the
nation's housing market, like the stock market of three years ago,
are in the midst of their own mania, with a noted California researcher
saying his analysis now puts the historically moderate-priced Twin
Cities market in what he terms a small bubble.
Some Twin Cities experts dispute that contention, but concede that
the local market may be reaching a plateau after a decade of near-record
growth.
For the economy, the implications of the debate are as large as
the fate of the stock market. Two-thirds of all Americans list their
home as their single biggest asset, with home equity now at a record
$7 trillion, according to a recent report from the Joint Center
for Housing Studies of Harvard University.
| Buying a home |
As
interest rates rise housing affordability falls. Click
here for a look at the effects of rising rates on a mortgage
payment. |
A boom-to-bust housing market in Southern California in the late
1980s and early '90s helped send that state's economy into deep
recession, depressing spending not only in related industries but
among consumers as well, since many homeowners were left temporarily
``underwater,'' owing as much or more on their mortgages than they
could realize by selling their homes.
No one foresees the possibility of home prices making a Nasdaq-style
freefall, particularly in the Twin Cities. They point out that real
estate prices are a regional, rather than national phenomenon, and
that demographic trends and wage growth also argue against a housing
collapse.
The more likely scenario - one that some believe already is becoming
evident - is that the heady gains that many homeowners have grown
accustomed to will level off. If that proves true, some of today's
buyers are investing at prices where rapid appreciation becomes
much harder to realize.
Bubble lite?
| Affordability Index |
A
score above 100 means that a family with a median income can
buy a median-priced house, so the higher the score the more
affordable the houses are in that market. Housing affordability
plummeted when home prices shot up in 1998, but went up again
recently when interest rates started going down again. the declines
in affordability in boston and San Francisco follow those cities'
rapid increases in prices. Click
here for chart. |
Jane Timm knows what a powerful wealth creator real estate can
be.
A former renter, Timm bought a condominium 10 years ago with $1,000
from her parents, a few thousand more from a first-time homeowner
program and a mortgage. After making $40,000 on the sale of her
condo, the 44-year-old clerk for the city of Edina bought a west
Edina home for $165,000 that's now worth about $225,000.
``I've had only good luck,'' Timm said of her real estate investing.
The magnitude of her gains isn't uncommon among Twin Cities home
buyers. In the five years that ended in the first quarter of 2002,
the metro area's median sale price increased an average of more
than 9 percent a year.
Last month, the median home price in the Twin Cities rose to a
record $188,900, almost 10 percent higher than it was in June of
last year, according to the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors.
In some areas, the gains were as high as 20 percent.
The pace of appreciation in the past five years is topped only
by the mid- to late 1970s, a time of dramatic inflation when people
were ``buying anything they could just to make a profit,'' said
George Karvel, chairman of the real estate department at the University
of St. Thomas.
Market research company Case Shiller Weiss sees more appreciation
ahead, but at a moderating pace - projecting an annual average price
gain of 6.1 percent this year and 4.6 percent next year for sales
of single-family houses. Case Shiller's analysis ranks the Twin
Cities as one of the strongest housing markets in the nation.
Where does that put our housing market?
In ``only a very slight bubble,'' according to John Burns,
a California researcher who compiles a housing cycle barometer that
analyzes home prices, income growth and other factors in markets
nationwide.
Burns said that a bubble - a dramatic rise in prices relative
to history - typically develops when homes become so expensive relative
to local incomes that buyers and employers begin to leave an area,
causing an imbalance in supply and demand.
That's not happening in the Twin Cities. People are still buying
despite the price rises, thanks in part to low interest rates.
But the low rates aren't keeping the Twin Cities from becoming
a more costly place to buy. Burns said that during the past 21 years
the ratio between the median home price in the Twin Cities and local
incomes has averaged about 2.5. The number has now risen to 2.9.
That figure still doesn't come close to what's happened in an expensive
market such as San Francisco, where the ratio has gone from a 21-year
average of 5.5 to 7.3, creating a more certain bubble environment.
But the Twin Cities trend is clearly toward a more expensive market.
A separate study by Harvard University researchers helps explain
why - Twin Cities household incomes grew 10 percent from 1997 to
2001, while home prices rose about 33 percent.
Tiered market
| Jobs |
Job
growth in the Twin Cities has been strong and steady relative
to cities like Boston, where job growth has been move erratic,
and San Francisco, where job growth has been nearly flat because
of softness in the tech industry. Click
here for chart. |
The local market is beginning to show some effects from these developments,
though not at all price levels.
Houses less than $250,000 remain in a robust seller's market, but
it has become more of a buyer's market for upper-bracket houses, Edina
Realty agent Sheri Fine said.
The first-time buyers' role in driving the market is reflected in
appreciation rates for starter houses. During the past five years,
the average price of a 1,040-square-foot house with one bathroom and
a detached garage in the Twin Cities metro area rose 62 percent, according
to research by the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors.
Larger houses - those with 1,485 to 1,515 square feet, two bathrooms
and a two-car garage - saw average appreciation of 47 percent in the
same period.
Agents say that people trying to sell houses at $300,000 and up are
now running into situations where it takes two months to find a buyer
instead of two weeks, and that a price reduction might be needed.
There is more supply on the market now, too. In June the number of
houses on the Twin Cities market was almost 15 percent higher than
the previous year, according to the Realtor association.
Of course, the old saw about location still applies. Multiple offers
are still coming for prime locations, such as the lakes neighborhoods
in south Minneapolis and the Macalester-Groveland area in St. Paul.
Whatever softness is emerging, Karvel said there's no threat of a
serious fall in prices. Minnesota real estate has never seen stock
market-like fluctuations, he said.
``It's not a bubble market. Prices have gone up consistently
over the last 50 to 55 years,'' Karvel said. ``The only difference
is whether it goes up 2 percent or 10 percent, but it doesn't go down.''
He believes the housing market is more likely to suffer a slowdown
in appreciation rather than a downturn.
``We've gone from a hyperactive economy needing a dose of Ritalin
to a normal economy,'' Karvel said. ``And you've gone from a seller's
market to a more normal market in housing.''
Nicolas Retsina, director of Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies,
is more circumspect, saying that housing ``is not immune from major
economic contractions.''
Harvard's State of the Nation's Housing report, a widely recognized
annual assessment of U.S. housing trends, cautions that any weakening
of demand at the lower end of the market could spread to other segments.
Karvel counters that housing markets lose their balance when households
earning the local median income cannot afford a median-priced home.
The Twin Cities have not crossed that threshold.
Sandy Loescher, a sales agent with Sandy Green- Realty in Minneapolis,
said she thinks the big gains in home prices in recent years are because
the Twin Cities had been an undervalued market for many years.
She and her husband and business partner, Ralph, recently paid $22,000
more than the list price for a south Minneapolis duplex. The sellers
received three offers, and the Loeschers' bid wasn't even the highest.
``Prices are approaching their true value,'' she said.
The gains also were fueled by a major jump in household income during
the 1990s, a trend driven in part by increases in the number of two-earner
families. The Twin Cities metro area had the fourth-highest household
median income in the 2000 census, up from 14th place in 1989.
Growth in Twin Cities' personal incomes is expected to trail the national
average this year, growing 3.2 percent instead of the 4 percent nationwide,
according to the Federal Reserve. For 2003, the area is expected to
keep pace with the rest of the nation.
The future
If Twin Cities home prices have soared this past decade thanks to
an unusual combination of events - an undervalued initial market,
interest rates at generational lows, low unemployment and a dramatic
rise in household incomes - what will keep them rising in the future?
| 30-year fixed mortgage |
Mortgage
interest rates have fallen to a 30-year low, prompting record
home prices and several refinance booms. Rates last week were
under 7 percent for a 30-year fixed-rate conventional mortgage.
Click here for chart. |
The area's economic diversity and projected population growth are
expected to be powerful forces in maintaining and boosting real estate
values over time.
In many states, the major economic center, the state capital and the
major university are all in different cities. But in Minnesota, the
Twin Cities are home to all three, creating one of the most recession-resistant
areas in the nation. Further, the state economy doesn't rise or fall
with the fortunes of any particular industry. Minnesota's unemployment
rate has been lower than the national average both in the boom times
of the 1990s and during this recent recession. In May, the state's
jobless rate was 4.3 percent, while the nationwide figure was 5.8
percent.
The Twin Cities area also is projected to add a million residents
to its current population of 2.6 million by 2030. Ted Mondale, chairman
of the Metropolitan Council, the planning agency for the seven-county
area, said he thinks the region will be 50,000 housing units short
of the number needed to accommodate those new residents, with a resulting
strong demand for homes.
``I don't think you're going to see prices drop,'' Mondale said. ``If
the economy goes south, you'll see that, but there are no indicators
that's going to happen over a long period of time.''
A rise in interest rates poses the single greatest threat to home
prices.
The large gains during the 1970s were brought to a halt by the Federal
Reserve in the early 1980s when mortgage rates rose to the mid-teens.
During most of the 1980s and early 1990s, annual appreciation rates
in the Twin Cities stayed under 5 percent as rates generally stayed
high.
It wasn't until rates fell significantly again in the mid-'90s that
rapid appreciation began again, culminating in an annual increase
of 14.8 percent during the first quarter of this year.
No one can predict interest rates long term, but Paul Anton, chief
economist with Anton, Lubov and Associates in Minneapolis, is optimistic
they will rise only slightly as the economy recovers.
``I don't see a huge risk that long-term rates will rise dramatically,''
he said.
Even a restrained increase in interest rates could mean a major shock
for the market.
A 30-year mortgage at 8.5 percent, instead
of 6.5 percent, costs about $250 more per month for a $180,000 mortgage.
That could push some buyers out of the market, said Kris Wilson, a
loan officer with Summit Mortgage in Bloomington.
``It makes it more difficult, and a certain
number will drop out - they'll have to,'' Wilson said.
While an interest-rate spike is considered unlikely, it has occurred
several times in recent years. Wilson recalled 1987, when rates quickly
went from 8 percent to 10.5 percent, sending shock waves through the
housing market.
Perhaps the best caution for buyers now, Karvel said, is to consider
the possibility that the market levels out, bringing returns more
in line with historic averages.
That's especially true for the growing number of homeowners thinking
about increasing their mortgage debt. According to the National Mortgage
Bankers Association, more than half of all mortgage applications now
are for refinancing.
And some of those borrowers have turned from incurring more debt to
buy stocks to incurring more debt to buy real estate.
Doug Winter, area manager for Wells Fargo Home Mortgage in Minneapolis,
said that during the last refinancing boom many people took out cash
to invest in the stock market. Now, Winter said, the refinancing proceeds
often are being used to buy a second or third home.
``People feel secure with the fact that they can actually touch it,
feel it, use it,'' Winters said of vacation property. ``People have
lost faith in the stock market and aren't willing to put more money
into it.''
- Staff Writer Larry Werner contributed to this report.
- Jim Buchta is at jbuchta@startribune.com.
-
Jim Buchta is at jbuchta@startribune.com
Copyright 2002 Star Tribune. All rights reserved.
Main | News
Room | The Art of
Vision | Prequalify / Preapprove
| Download Free
Forms
1st Time Home Buyers
| Testimonials | Map
| Contact Us |